May 17, 2008

ClickBank Affiliate Woes: When Tracking Breaks Down

Filed under: Corporate Evangelism — admin @ 4:13 am

Hardly a day goes by without a forum posting in which ClickBank is challenged about the reliability and integrity of its affiliate referral tracking mechanism - the hoplink system. It cannot be denied that ClickBank’s technical infrastructures do not always inspire the greatest level of confidence. But this article sets out to demonstrate that a range of factors play a part in the integrity of affiliate tracking and any one of these can be the cause of those much-reviled commission losses.

Given the reliance of affiliate programs on cookie technology, it is important to understand the problems that may arise from this technology and what can be done to alleviate them.

The browser cookie is an essential ingredient in accurately and consistently allocating commission to the correct referring affiliate. If no referral cookie is present on a prospect’s computer when she makes a purchase, no affiliate will collect the commission. With ClickBank’s hoplink system (though not necessarily with other affiliate systems), this requirement holds true even if the prospect purchases immediately upon referral.

There are four reasons for missing cookies:

Deletion: Cookies can be deleted through a variety of computer maintenance operations. Some of these are explicit (e.g. instructing the browser to clear all its temporary files) and some are automatic (e.g. software utilities that perform routine, scheduled computer housekeeping).

Expiration: Each affiliate program implements its own policy determining the time period referral cookies will remain valid. Once a cookie reaches its expiration date, it ceases to have any effect on the allocation of affiliate commission. ClickBank’s affiliate tracking cookies are valid for 60 days.

Overflow: To comply with the recommendations of the Netscape Cookie Specification, a web browser needs to support the storage of at least 300 cookies. Beyond this level, the browser is free to delete cookies in order to reclaim disk space, on a first-in-first-out basis. In theory, this means that referral cookies may be prematurely deleted if a large influx of new cookies causes the limit to be exceeded. In practice, this issue is no cause for concern, as disk space is now abundant and most modern browsers do not implement such limits.

Rejection: If the prospect’s browser is configured to reject cookies, or uses filtering criteria that reject cookies from the affiliate program’s domain, a referral cookie will never be created for that user.

Little can be done by affiliates to directly protect against cookie deletion or expiration. Therefore, affiliates should be aware of the issue when selecting products, giving preference to products most likely to generate a prompt purchase. Any product that requires an extensive period of reflection prior to purchase represents an increased risk of commission losses to the affiliate.

Cookie rejection is also a serious issue for affiliates. The current versions of all major browsers are installed with cookies enabled, so it takes a conscious effort on the part of the user to disable support for cookies. However, inaccurate media coverage of cookies has increased the number of web consumers who do systematically reject them.

Fortunately, following a series of recent change to the ClickBank hoplink system, a referral will now only take place if the client computer accepts the ClickBank tracking cookie. This is great comfort to ClickBank affiliates, who can no longer be deprived of their commission because of cookie rejection. Merchants, in contrast, may not be so happy that willing prospects are being turned away because of an errant configuration in their computer.

ClickBank faces a difficult balancing act in attempting to implement systems that are fair to both the merchant and the affiliate. And whilst the company’s technology may not always be perfect, it is reassuring to note that not every forum scare story is founded on fact.

About The Author

Copyright © Tim Coulter. All rights reserved.

Tim Coulter is a consultant and software developer who helps netpreneurs to harness marketing technologies.

He is also the author of “ClickBank - The Definitive Guide” The Ultimate ClickBank Tutorial & Reference Manual.

http://www.clickbankrevealed.com/

America’s New Ten Most Wanted

Filed under: Online Casino — admin @ 3:57 am

Just about everybody turned into the selection show last night on CBS to see if their team made it in. As usual there were many players, coaches and fans who feel “cheated” that they are not in the NCAA Tourney. In my opinion there are 5-6 teams that should have been in the Big Dance but the Selection Committee saw otherwise. You may be asking yourself “I’ve heard of this selection committee, but don’t even know who they are.” This committee is made up of ten members of a mixture of commissioners and athletic directors. Five of this years members were members of last years committee. These committee members are the ones that “cheated” you.

Craig K. Littlepage, AD, University of Virginia

2005-2006 Chairman of the Selection Committee
College Basketball Experience: Assistant Coach at Virginia two different times, 1976-1982 and from ‘88-90. In between those two jobs, he held a Head Coaching spot at Penn ‘82-85 and Rutgers ‘85-88.

Robert Vowels, Commissioner, Southwestern Athletic Conference (SWAC)

College Basketball Experience: nothing notable.

Thomas O’Connor, AD, George Mason University
College Basketball Experience: Head Coach at Dartmouth College ‘72-74 and then for Loyola ‘74-76.

Christopher Hill, AD, University of Utah
College Basketball Experience: Played hoops at Rutgers and lettered for 3 years ‘69-72.

Karl D. Benson, Commissioner, Western Athletic Conference
College Basketball Experience: none notable.

Michael L. Slive, Commissioner, Southeastern Conference
College Basketball Experience: none notable.

Jon Le Crone, Commissioner, Horizon League
College Basketball Experience: Played hoops at Wake Forest.

Daniel Guerrero, AD, UCLA
College Basketball Experience: none notable. (baseball player)

Gerald L. Myers, AD, Texas Tech University
College Basketball Experience: All Conference Player at Texas Tech, Head Coach at Texas Tech ‘70-91.

Gary D. Walters, AD, Princeton University
2006-2007 Chairman
College Basketball Experience: 3 time letter winner at Princeton Head Coach at Middlebury College ‘70-73, Head Coach in ‘73 at Dartmouth College .

For a committee who has such a large responsibility, there seems to be a lack of basketball experience on the entire selection crew. For those fans of the teams that were left out, my condolences and there is your Ten Most Wanted. There will be a couple members left over on next years committee and Gary Walters is the Chairman for next season. Enjoy the tournament and good luck on your brackets!

I appreciate any comments/questions via email.

Jerrad Hendrikson is a documented member of the Professional Handicappers League.
Read all of his articles at http://www.procappers.com/Jerrad_Hendrikson.htm.